By Daniel F. Blanchard, III

[published in Volume 2 of the South Carolina Bar’s 2004 publication entitled “South Carolina Damages”]

A. Introduction

South Carolina is among the majority of jurisdictions that have recognized tort liability for intentional interference with a person’s economic relationship with a third party. Tort liability is imposed for intentional interference with the performance of an existing contract or the formation of a prospective one.

B. Intentional Interference with Existing Contract

1. Theory of Tort

A cause of action for intentional interference with contract is a tort cause of action separate from a cause of action arising from the contract itself. The cause of action for intentional interference with a contractual relationship is premised on the tortious behavior of someone not a party to the contract. Consequently, a party to a contract cannot be liable for tortious interference with that contract.

Oppression of Shareholders, Good Faith and the Duty of Loyalty

01/31/2013

Published by the International Society of Primerus Law Firms in Paradigm

Read More

Interference with Contractual and Business Relations

05/21/2008

South Carolina is among the majority of jurisdictions that have recognized tort liability for intentional interference with a person's economic relationship with a third party. Tort liability is imposed for intentional interference with the performance of an existing contract or the formation of a prospective one.

Read More