Interference with Contractual and Business Relations

Rosen Hagood
Rosen Hagood May 21, 2008

By Daniel F. Blanchard, III

[published in Volume 2 of the South Carolina Bar’s 2004 publication entitled “South Carolina Damages”]

A. Introduction

South Carolina is among the majority of jurisdictions that have recognized tort liability for intentional interference with a person’s economic relationship with a third party. Tort liability is imposed for intentional interference with the performance of an existing contract or the formation of a prospective one.

B. Intentional Interference with Existing Contract

1. Theory of Tort

A cause of action for intentional interference with contract is a tort cause of action separate from a cause of action arising from the contract itself. The cause of action for intentional interference with a contractual relationship is premised on the tortious behavior of someone not a party to the contract. Consequently, a party to a contract cannot be liable for tortious interference with that contract.

Rosen Hagood

Rosen Hagood

Founded in 1947, Rosen Hagood had a vision: to aggressively seek justice on behalf of our clients. Since then, the firm has developed a long record of pursuing and defending complex civil claims in a range of practice areas. Businesses, individuals, and government entities throughout South Carolina turn to Rosen Hagood when they are faced with complex litigation and damages claims.

Contact Us